Who each obligation actually falls on
Two views of the same obligations. One sorts them by the role that carries them; the other records what generators publish about the marking those roles depend on. As of 2026-09-12.
Role is the axis that matters for a production company, because a team can be a deployer of one system and the provider of another in the same week. The matrix keeps the two apart so that a reading of the text can be applied to a real arrangement.
The vendor record is the other half. Several obligations assume a machine-readable mark exists in the output, and whether one exists is a question about products rather than about law. The record says what each generator publishes on that point, which is usually nothing.
1The views
- By role — Which paragraph of EU AI Act Article 50 binds the provider, which binds the deployer, and the moment each duty takes effect for generated video.
- What generators document — Sixteen AI tools read against Article 50(2): what each vendor's own pages state about marking output, and what takes the visible mark off.
Neither page gives legal advice; both set published text beside published product documentation and leave the conclusion to the reader.
Elsewhere in the record: EU, Generators, Statements, Pairs, Fields, Questions, Terms, Learn, Data. How an instrument is read is set out on the sourcing page.