LTX Studio and Pika on where the paid boundary sits

This is the one pair in the record where both sides are the same arrangement at different heights. It is filed because the height is the finding, and because it changes who can reach unmarked output without asking anybody. As of 2026-09-12.

Fig. 1 Filing the two together is what makes the weakness visible; separately each looks like a finding.

Fig. 2 Filled where the page behind the row names something in that column, hollow where that page is silent. Silence is recorded rather than filled in.

Fig. 3 How many rows carry something in each column. A column nobody fills is a finding about what has been published, not a gap in this record.

LTX Studio and Pika on the same column, point by point. Recorded 2026-09-12.
Point	LTX Studio	Pika
Where the mark stops	From the Lite plan upward	From the $28 Pro plan upward
How the free tier is filled	By omission	By omission
Machine-readable layer	Not documented	Not documented

Inclusion rule. Two entries whose published answers to one column pull in different directions. Cells hold each vendor's own wording from the page its entry names; pairs that agree on the column are not filed at all. Order. Fixed order, and the two columns are in the order the heading gives them.

1The height of a boundary decides who crosses it

A crossing point at the second tier is reachable by a solo operator on a trial budget without an approval conversation. A crossing point several tiers up is a purchasing decision somebody signs off.

That is a workflow fact rather than a legal one, and it is the only substantive difference between these two entries. The obligation on a publisher is identical either side of either boundary.

2Identical shape, and both cells are inferences

Neither page states what free-tier output carries. Both cells are filled from a phrase present higher up the table and absent lower down, which is the weakest kind of evidence this record admits.

Filing them together makes the weakness visible. Two entries reaching the same conclusion by the same inference is not corroboration; it is the same method applied twice.

3What neither page reaches

The provider duty asks for something software can read, and neither page describes such a signal at any price. Both entries therefore record no documentation on that row rather than an absence of marking.

This is the majority position in the record. Most generators here price a visible mark and say nothing whatever about the layer the clause addresses to whoever built the system.

LTX Studio
No watermarking is listed from the Lite plan upwardplan that removes the visible markLTX Studio, pricing / recorded 2026-09-12
Pika
Watermark-free download is listed from the $28 Pro plan upwardplan that removes the visible markPika, pricing / recorded 2026-09-12

4Sources

Read from the pricing page at ltx.io and the pricing page at pika.art, consulted 2026-09-12. Full entries: LTX Studio and Pika. The column itself is on What it asks for. Other pairs on file: Runway and Synthesia, SceneMixer and HeyGen.