SenseDefend

Synthetic-media instruments, by article and effective date

Which tools add nothing unless a request asks

Two entries put marking behind a parameter documented as optional with a false default. A team that never read that documentation has decided what every file in a season carries, without knowing a decision existed. As of 2026-09-12.

Where the answer lives, and where it does notA parameter set per request can differ between two clips made an hour apart. Nothing outside the caller's own logs records which is which, and neither vendor undertakes to remember on the caller's behalf.The integrationis writtenSomebody decideswhether to sendthe flag, oftenbefore anydeliveryOne decisionA season rendersEvery fileinherits thatdecision withoutanybodyrevisiting itHundreds offilesA questionarrivesWhat did thisclip carry, andwhy, and whodecidedUnanswerableUnless it wasloggedOne fieldwritten atrender timeturns thequestion into alookup
Fig. 1 Stating the default explicitly is the more informative half of both pages, and the half most references omit.
What two API references say about marking, and what neither says. Recorded 2026-09-12.
PointWhere it sitsWhat the record holds
The flag existsBoth API referencesAn optional parameter that adds a label to the output
The flag defaults to offBoth API referencesNothing is added unless the request asks for it
Where a past value can be foundNeither pageOnly in whatever the caller's own pipeline logged

Inclusion rule. Entries read from an interface reference where the marking control is documented as per-request. Account-level and tier-level controls are recorded elsewhere. Order. The capability first, then the default, then what is missing.

1A capability is not a behaviour

A parameter that can add a label makes disclosure possible and performs none of it. Whether a file carries one depends on the call that produced it, so no claim about a library of clips follows from the existence of the flag.

Both pages state the default explicitly, which is the more informative half and the half most references omit. The record quotes it rather than inferring it from the word optional.

2Two references agreeing is a finding, not a comparison

These two are not filed as a pair, because a page reporting that two vendors do the same thing has nothing else to report. The agreement is still informative on its own: off by default looks like the norm for programmatic video.

What differs between them is everything downstream. One states the wording and the corner of the mark it adds; the other names only a category. One also publishes its weights, which puts a second population outside any flag.

3The person who decided may be the one nobody consulted

An account setting is chosen by somebody with a budget. A request parameter is chosen by whoever built the integration, often months before a first delivery and usually without the question being raised at all.

Neither of those is the publisher, and the disclosure duty lands on the publisher. This is the shortest demonstration in the record that a lever and an obligation can sit at different desks.

4Sources

Article wording from AI Act Explorer, Article 50; vendor statements from the pages listed on each generator entry. Both read 2026-09-12. Related: Who can check it, The audio half, Open weights.