Which paragraphs name providers, and which name deployers
Paragraph 1 names providers. Paragraphs 3 and 4 name deployers. The recitals the Explorer links to the article are 120, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136 and 137. Which word covers a given organisation is settled by the Act's own definitions, not by this page. As of 2026-09-12.
| Point | Where it sits | What the record holds |
|---|---|---|
| Providers | Named in paragraph 1 | Defined in the Act, not on this page |
| Deployers | Named in paragraphs 3 and 4 | Defined in the Act, not on this page |
| Recitals | 120 and 132 to 137 | Context the Explorer links to this article |
Inclusion rule. Parties are recorded as the article names them, paragraph by paragraph. This record does not classify any organisation and does not reproduce the definitions, which sit in Article 3. Order. In the order the paragraphs appear.
1The words are about activity, and this register does not apply them
Provider and deployer are defined elsewhere in the Act, and which one covers a given organisation turns on the activity rather than on its size or its industry, and the Act defines both words in Article 3. The same name can sit on either side on different days.
Which is why no row here places a company on either side. A register that assigned organisations to categories would be making the one call that actually requires a lawyer, and it would be making it from a page.
2Recitals are context, not obligations
The numbered recitals sit before the articles and explain what the text is for. They are routinely quoted as though they imposed duties, and they do not; they are the material a reader uses when an article's wording is ambiguous.
They are recorded here as a list of numbers so that a reader can go and read them, which is a more useful service than paraphrasing seven recitals into a sentence.
3Why this record stops where it does
Everything above is quotation and pointing. The interesting questions, which paragraph applies to which activity and what compliance looks like, are the ones that turn on facts outside any document.
This site exists because the quotation and the pointing were hard to find in one place, not because the answers were. Nothing here is legal advice.
- Article 50(1)Providers must design systems so people are told they are dealing with an AI systemunless it is obvious in context
- Article 50(3)Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must inform the people exposed to it
- Article 50(4)Deployers must disclose AI-generated text published to inform the public on matters of public interestsecond subparagraph
- recitals the Explorer links to Article 50Recitals 120, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136 and 137
4Sources
Article wording from AI Act Explorer, Article 50; vendor statements from the pages listed on each generator entry. Both read 2026-09-12. Related: Still to be written, Inside the file, Numbers without names.