SenseDefend

Synthetic-media instruments, by article and effective date

HeyGen on removal named on two tiers and absent from a third

The page names two tiers that remove the mark and says nothing about the free tier, which is where the free-tier cell comes from. Naming two prices rather than one changes very little for the clause and something for a reader. As of 2026-09-22.

What naming two tiers adds, and where it stopsWhere only the cheapest qualifying plan is named, a reader has to assume everything above behaves alike. Naming two removes that assumption for those two and extends no further, so the cell does not fill in the pattern.Two tiers namedRemoval listed as afeature of both, atstated pricesDirect evidenceFree tier silentThe phrase does notappear in that columnat allAn omissionEverything elseBespoke or unlistedarrangements are simplyunaddressed
Fig. 1 A small, real improvement in evidence, recorded as exactly that and no more.
HeyGen on the deployer disclosure column, and what that column leaves open. Recorded 2026-09-22.
PointWhat the record holds
Article 50(4), deployer disclosureA visible mark on free-plan output, read from an omission
Read fromA pricing page listing removal as a feature of two tiers
What it does not settleWhy the mark is applied in the first place

Inclusion rule. One cell of this generator's entry, quoted from the page the entry names. Coverage, commentary and third-hand summaries are not admitted, in either direction. Order. Fixed order: the cell, the page it came off, then the limit on reading it.

1Two tiers named is a small improvement in evidence

Where a vendor names only the cheapest qualifying plan, a reader has to assume everything above it behaves the same way. Where two are named explicitly, that assumption is not needed for those two.

It does not extend any further. Whether a plan outside the pair, or a bespoke arrangement, produces marked output is unaddressed, and the cell does not fill that in from the pattern.

2An avatar tool and a video model face the same paragraph

The deployer duty does not care which technique produced the footage. A synthetic presenter reading a script is generated content in exactly the sense the paragraph uses, and a publisher owes the same disclosure as they would for a generated scene.

What differs is how obvious the generation is. A viewer who recognises a stock avatar may need no notice at all, which is the ground the exemption for the obvious case sits on, and that exemption belongs to a different paragraph.

3The row that stays empty on a pricing page

Nothing here addresses a signal software could read. That row records no documentation, which is the state of nine entries in this record and the ordinary outcome when the only source is a plan table.

An ordinary silence like that did not earn a page of its own. It is counted once, on the column page where silence is recorded, rather than repeated as a separate entry for every vendor that shares it.

  • HeyGen
    Watermark removal is not listed among the free plan's featuresthe free tier read as an omissionHeyGen, pricing / recorded 2026-09-22
  • Article 50(4)
    Deployers must disclose image, audio or video content that is a deep fakefirst subparagraphAI Act Explorer, Article 50 / recorded 2026-09-12

4Sources

Wording taken from the pricing page at heygen.com, consulted 2026-09-22. All four rows for this generator sit on HeyGen; the same column across every entry is read down on What it asks for. Filed beside it: Hailuo on an AIGC label parameter, Wan on a corner mark and its words.