SenseDefend

Synthetic-media instruments, by article and effective date

Deepfake, a defined term and a headline word

Deepfake appears in transparency law as a defined category attached to a disclosure duty. Outside it the word covers anything synthetic and unwelcome, which makes quoting a clause about it unusually error-prone. As of 2026-09-12.

Scope depends entirely on where the word appearsIn an instrument the word is a defined category with a duty attached, and the definition governs. In coverage it means any synthetic depiction of a real person. In conversation it means synthetic media somebody objects to.Where did the reader meet this word?In an instrumentA defined categoryThe definition governs, anda disclosure duty isattached to itIn press coverageAny synthetic depictionUsually of a real person,usually without a definitionIn conversationWhatever is objected toCarries no scope at all, andtravels fastestThe duty attached to the narrow sense is a disclosure, not a ban
Fig. 1 Quoting the clause is shorter than explaining the word, and it is the only form anybody can check.
Deepfake, as published. Recorded 2026-09-12.
Where the word appearsWhat it covers there
In a transparency instrumentA defined category, with a disclosure attached
In press coverageAny synthetic depiction of a real person
In product marketingRarely used at all, for obvious reasons
In ordinary conversationSynthetic media somebody objects to

Inclusion rule. Contexts in which the word is used with a materially different scope. Order. From the narrowest usage to the widest.

1A defined term is narrower than its reputation

Where an instrument defines a category and attaches a duty to it, the definition governs. Material outside it is not covered by that duty, whatever anybody calls it.

Reading the duty without the definition is the commonest way this part of a transparency regime gets misreported, including by people summarising it accurately.

2The duty in question is a disclosure, not a prohibition

A transparency instrument asking for disclosure is not banning anything. It is asking that an audience be told, which is a much smaller intervention than headlines about the word usually suggest.

That distinction matters for anybody planning production. A disclosure obligation is a workflow and documentation question; a prohibition would be a commissioning question.

3Creative work is treated differently, and not exempted

Instruments in this area tend to narrow the duty for work that is evidently artistic or fictional rather than removing it. What survives is usually a requirement to reveal that generated content exists.

Which is a small requirement and still a requirement. A production that has removed every mark from its files has not thereby answered it, and nothing in a vendor page addresses it either.

4Why a register is better off not using the word

Because its scope depends entirely on where it appears, a cell containing it tells a reader almost nothing unless the definition travels with it. Quoting the clause is shorter than explaining the word.

Where a register has to use it, the useful form names the instrument and the paragraph. That converts a contested word into a citation, which is the only form anybody can check.

5Published material behind this entry

A term in this record: what it means, and what the published material says about it, each figure read on 2026-09-12. Related: Provider, Deployer.