SenseDefend

Synthetic-media instruments, by article and effective date

Pika on the tier at which the visible mark stops

Nothing in the product moves this mark. It goes when the plan changes, which makes the state of any given file a function of what was paid at the moment it was produced rather than of what anybody clicked. As of 2026-09-12.

A lever above the operator, by accidentNobody designed a tier boundary as a marking control, and the page does not present it as one. The effect on a production is the same: the person rendering clips cannot remove the notice, deliberately or otherwise.On the entry planOn the qualifying planWho can remove the markNobody in the productAnybody with accessWhat it takesA purchasing decisionDownloading the fileRecoverable later fromAn invoiceAn invoiceOther layers affectedNone describedNone describedOne boundary, and it is the whole lever
Fig. 1 Where an organisation wants marking to be policy rather than habit, packaging supplies it here for unrelated reasons.
Pika on the who controls it column, and what that column leaves open. Recorded 2026-09-12.
PointWhat the record holds
Who controls itThe plan: watermark-free download from $28 Pro upward
Read fromA subscription pricing page listing tiers side by side
What it does not settleWhether anything remains in the file after removal

Inclusion rule. One cell of this generator's entry, quoted from the page the entry names. Coverage, commentary and third-hand summaries are not admitted, in either direction. Order. Fixed order: the cell, the page it came off, then the limit on reading it.

1A lever one level above the operator

An assistant working on the entry plan cannot remove the mark by accident and cannot remove it deliberately either. Where an organisation wants marking to be policy rather than habit, that property is worth noticing.

It arrives as a side effect of packaging rather than as a stated intent. Nobody designed the tier boundary as a control, and the page does not present it as one, but the effect on a production is the same.

2What a purchase makes recoverable

Invoices survive staff turnover, interface redesigns and changed defaults. A mark gated by tier can therefore be reasoned about years later from documents nobody had to remember to keep.

That is the one respect in which this arrangement is easier to account for than a switch or a request flag. It also says nothing about which files were produced in which month, which is the other half of the question.

3Removal is described for one layer only

The page describes buying away something a viewer can see. Nothing is described as being in the file besides that, in either direction, so nothing is described as surviving the purchase.

The record keeps those columns apart for that reason. A tier that clears the visible layer has not necessarily touched a machine-readable one, and on this entry the second layer was never documented at all.

  • Pika
    Watermark-free download is listed from the $28 Pro plan upwardplan that removes the visible markPika, pricing / recorded 2026-09-12
  • Article 50(5)
    The information must be given clearly and distinguishably at the latest at the first interaction or exposureand must meet accessibility requirementsAI Act Explorer, Article 50 / recorded 2026-09-12

4Sources

Wording taken from the pricing page at pika.art, consulted 2026-09-12. All four rows for this generator sit on Pika; the same column across every entry is read down on Who controls it. Filed beside it: LTX Studio on the second tier, Kling on removal as a benefit.